The Five Moves
Almost everything a chapter decides can be handled with five moves. Learn those five, use them on one real decision at every meeting, and you can function in any deliberative body — including the ILC Business Session — without ever memorising the rest of the book.
The five, in order
- Move it — “I move that…” One sentence, stated as the thing you want the chapter to do.
- Second it — a second means one other person thinks it is worth discussing. It is not agreement.
- Debate it — the chair recognises speakers; each speaker addresses the chair; nobody speaks twice until everyone who wants to has spoken once.
- Amend it — insert words, strike words, or strike and insert. An amendment is voted on before the motion it changes.
- Vote it — a voice vote first. If the result is in doubt, anyone may call for a division, which is a show of hands or standing count.
What each move is for
The test asks purpose, not vocabulary. A move you can name but cannot place is not yet learned.
- A motion exists so the chapter debates one clear proposal rather than a topic.
- A second exists so one person cannot consume the meeting alone.
- Debate rules exist so the quietest member gets a turn before the loudest gets a second one.
- Amendment exists so a nearly-right proposal gets fixed instead of killed.
- Division exists so a close vote is counted rather than guessed.
Do this
- At the next chapter meeting, take one decision the chapter genuinely needs to make and run it using only these five moves. Not a simulation — a real decision.
- Print the card. Keep it at the officer table for the first three meetings, then take it away.
- Once a month, ask a member at random to name the five moves in order. Spacing, not review, is what makes it stick.
Where it shows up: Every chapter business meeting. You will already be ready for the Parliamentary Procedure band of Organizational Leadership, and for the floor at ILC.
Coach note
Grounded in
RONR 12th ed. (effective 1 September 2020; a revised printing issued June 2026 is the same edition). The tiered, spaced-retrieval design follows Dunlosky et al. (2013), Psychological Science in the Public Interest — practice testing and distributed practice rated high utility; massed single-session instruction rated low.